Low-Intensity Laser Therapy Is An
Effective Treatment For Recurrent Herpes Simplex
Infection. Results From A Randomized Double-Blind
Placebo Controlled Study
Schindl A, Neuman R.
J Investigative Dermatology. 1999; 113 (2): 221-223.
50 patients with recurrent perioral herpes simplex
infections (at least once a month for more than 6
months) were treated with 690 nm, 80 mW laser, 48
J/cm2, in a double blind study. Patients received
daily irradiations for two weeks, 10 treatments. The
treatment was given in a recurrencefree period and
the irradiation was given at the site of the
original herpes simplex infection. If both lips were
involved, both upper and lower lips were treated.
Patients were monitored for 52 weeks.
The mean recurrence-free interval in the laser group
was 37.5 weeks (range; 2-52 weeks) and in
the placebo group 3 weeks (range 1-20 weeks). No
side effects were noted.
Double Blind Crossover Trial Of
Low Level Laser Therapy In The Treatment Of Post
Herpetic Neuralgia
Kevin C Moore Naru Hira. Parswanath S. Kramer,
Copparam S. Jayakumar and Toshio Oshiro
Post herpetic. neuralgia can he an extremely painful
condition which in many cases proves
resistant lo all the accepted forms of treatment. II
is frequently most severe in the elderly and may
persist for years with no predictable course. This
trial was designed as a double blind assessment of
the efficacy of low level laser therapy in the
relief of the pain of post herpetic neuralgia with
patients acting as their own controls. Admission to
the trial was limited to patients with established
post herpetic neuralgia of at least six months
duration and who had shown little or no response to
conventional methods of treatment. Measurements of
pain intensity and distribution were noted over a
period of eight treatments in two groups of patients
each of which received tour consecutive laser
treatments. The results ides demonstrate a
significant reduction in both pain intensity and
distribution following a course of low level laser
therapy.
Efficacy Of Laser Irradiation
On The Area Near The Stellate Ganglion Is
Dose-Dependent: Double-Blind Crossover
Placebo-Controlled Study
Toshikazu Hashimoto, Osamu Kemmotsu, Hiroshi Otsuka,
Rie Numazawa, and Yoshihiro Ohta, Department of
Anaesthesia, Hokkaido University Hospital,
Sapporo, Japan
In the present study we evaluate the effects of
laser irradiation on the area near the stellate
ganglion on regional skin temperature and pain
intensity in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. A
double blind, crossover and placebo-controlled study
was designed to deny the placebo effect of laser
irradiation. Eight in patients (male 6, female 2)
receiving laser therapy for pain attenuation were
enrolled in the study after institutional approval
and informed consent. Each patient received three
sessions of treatment on a separate day in a
randomised fashion. Three minutes irradiation with a
150 mW laser (session 1), 3 minutes irradiation with
a 60 mW laser (session 2), and 3 minutes placebo
treatment without laser irradiation Neither the
patient nor the therapist was aware which session
type was being applied until the end of the study.
Regional skin temperature was evaluated by
thermography of the forehead, and pain intensity was
recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS).
Measurement were performed before
treatment, immediately after (0 minutes) then 5, 10,
15, and 30 min after treatment. Regional skin
temperature increased following both 150 mW and 60mW
laser irradiation, whereas no changes were obtained
by
placebo treatment. VAS decreased following both 150
mW and 60 mW laser treatments, but no
changes in VAS were obtained by placebo treatment.
These changes in the temperature and
VAS were further dependent on the energy density,
i.e the dose. Results demonstrate that laser
irradiation near the stellate ganglion produces
effects similar to stellate ganglion block. Our
results clearly indicate that they are not placebo
effects but true effects of laser irradiation.
Addressee for Correspondance:
Toshikazu Hashimoto MD, Department of
Anesthesia, I Hokkaido University I Hospital N15,
W7, Kita-ku Sapporo, Japan
060. 3/97 Rep US $ 8-10 12 ©1997 by LT Publishers l.
.K., Ltd. LASER THERAPY 1997:9:7-- 12
Efficacy Of Low Reactive-Level
Laser Therapy For Pain Attenuation Of Postherpetic
Neuralgia
Osamu Kemmotsu, Kenichi Sato,Hitoshi Furumido, Koji
Harada, Chizuko Takigawa, Shigeo Kaseno, Sho Yokota,
Yukari Hanaoka and Takeyasu Yamamura Department of
Anaesthesiology,
Hokkaido University School of Medicine, N-15. W-7,
Kita-ku. Sapporo 060, Japan.
The efficacy of low reactive-level laser therapy (LLLT)
for pain attenuation in patients with
postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) was evaluated in 63
patients (25 males. 38 females with an
average age of 69 years) managed at our pain clinic
over the past four years. A double blind
assessment of LLLT was also performed in 12 PHN
patients. The LLLT system is a gallium
aluminum arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser (830 nm, 60
mW continuous wave). Pain scores (PS)
were obtained using a linear analog scale (i) to
10))) before and after LLLT. The immediate effect
after the initial LLLT was very good (PS: (}3) in
26, and good (PS: 7-4) in 30 patients. The longterm
effect at the end of LLLT (the average number of
treatments 36 + 12) resulted in no pain
(PS: 0) in 12patients and slight pain (PS: 1-4) in
46 patients. No complications attributable to
LLLT occurred. Although a placebo effect was
observed, decreases in pain scores and increases
of the body surface temperature by LLLT were
significantly greater than those that occurred with
the placebo treatment. Our results indicate that
LLLT is a useful modality for pain attenuation in
PHN patients and because LLLT is a noninvasive,
painless and safe method of therapy, it is well
acceptable by patients.
Addressee for correspondence:
Osamu Kemmotsu, Department of
Anaesthesiology,Hokkaido University School of
Medicine, N-
15, W-7, Kita-ku, Sapporo 060,Japan.
0898-5901/91/020071-05$05.00 Ì 1991 by John Wiley &
Sons, Ltd.
Laser
therapy of human herpes simplex lesions
By Arturo Guerra Alfonso and Pedro José Muñoz,
Clinic "Leonardo Fernández Sánchez" , Cienfuegos,
Cuba.
Email
Herpes
simplex is an illness caused by the human herpes
virus types 1 and 2 that generally present a primary
lesion, with periods of latency and a tendency to
relapse. It is also known as Button of fever
or Bladder of fever. According to the World
Health Organisation (WHO) an international
prevalence of about 60% is observed (1, 2).
An
experimental study was carried out, where 232
patients affected by the Herpes simplex type 1 virus
were treated. All patients attended the clinic
"Leonardo Fernández" of the area 3 of the
municipality of Cienfuegos, during the period of
January 2001 to January 2003, with the objective of
determining the time of recurrence of the labial
Herpes in the groups, studied before and after
treatment, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the
Laser of low power in the treatment of the infection
of the virus.
Two
groups were selected (study and control) with 116
patients in each group, distributed and classified
according to the clinical stage in which they went
to consultation. In the study group the patients
were offered treatment with a LASERMED 670 DL, a
GaAlAs diode laser (30mW – 40 sec) in the prodromal
stage and stage of vesicles; or (20mW – 2 min) in
the crust stage and in lesions infected secondarily.
To all these patients was also applied radiation
among the vertebras C2-C3 where the resident
ganglion of the virus is located during the latent
periods (30mW - 30sec).
The
control group was offered indicated treatment with
antivirals (Aciclovir in cream and in pills) and
other palliative therapies.
After
having carried out the analysis of the data
obtained, the following results were obtained:
Chart
No.
1
The
patients of the study group. Distribution according
to the frequency of annual recurrence of the labial
herpes before and after receiving treatment.
|
Table No.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution of the patients in the study
group acc. to the frequency of annual
recurrence of herpes after laser therapy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Study
group
n=116 |
Recurrence frequency |
|
|
Once a month |
Every 2 to 3 months |
Every 4 to 5 months |
Every 6 month |
Once a year |
For the first time |
non recurrence |
|
|
Befote
treatment |
9 |
26 |
58 |
12 |
7 |
4 |
_ |
|
|
After
treatment |
_ |
_ |
37 |
22 |
25 |
_ |
32 |
|
When
analyzing the chart No.1 it is observed that the
groups of patients that had Labial Herpes with high
frequencies of recurrence (after being treated with
Laser and to wait one year to evaluate their
effectiveness), reported recurrence for more
elongated periods of time and 32 patients didn't
even have any more recurrence.
Chart
No.2
The
patients of the control group. Distribution
according to the annual recurrence frequency of the
labial herpes before and after receiving treatment.
|
Control
group
n=116 |
Recurrence frequency after receiving
treatment |
|
Once a month |
Every 2 to 3 months |
Every 4 to 5 months |
Every 6 month |
Once a year |
For the first time |
non recurrence |
|
Befote
treatment |
7 |
24 |
56 |
14 |
9 |
6 |
_ |
|
After
treatment |
6 |
21 |
46 |
27 |
14 |
_ |
2 |
In the
chart No. 2 the same previous aspects are reflected
but in the control group. As can be observed the
cases diminished in number, although discreetly;
those that presented more recurrence and of equal
number of recurrencies increased in number of
patient in the periods of more lingering recurrence.
In this group 2 patients reported not to have had
more lesions during the analyzed year.
Chart
No.3
The
patients of both groups. Distribution according to
the annual recurrence frequency of the labial herpes
after receiving treatment.
|
|
Recurrence frequency after receiving
treatment |
|
Once a month |
Every 2 to 3 months |
Every 4 to 5 months |
Every 6 months |
Once a year |
non recurrence |
|
Study
group
n=116 |
_ |
_ |
37 |
22 |
25 |
32 |
|
Control
group
n=116 |
6 |
21 |
46 |
27 |
14 |
2 |
In the
chart No. 3 are compared both groups as for the
annual frequency of recurrence after having received
the corresponding treatment. When analyzing this,
the superiority of the group treated with Laser
becomes evident.
Chart
No.
4
The
patients' of both groups. Distribution with
relationship to the clinical stage in that we
intervened and the time of cure of the same ones.
|
Clinical stage |
Time of cure |
|
First 48h |
3 a 4 days |
5 a 7 days |
More than 7 days |
Total |
|
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
No. |
% |
|
|
Study group
n=116 |
Prodromal |
26 |
100 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
26 |
|
Vesicles |
40 |
95 |
2 |
4,8 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
42 |
|
Crust |
31 |
91 |
3 |
8,8 |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
34 |
|
Secondary infection |
_ |
_ |
13 |
93 |
1 |
7,2 |
_ |
_ |
14 |
|
Control group
n=116 |
Prodromal |
_ |
_ |
25 |
96 |
1 |
3,9 |
_ |
_ |
26 |
|
Vesicles |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
9 |
22 |
33 |
79 |
42 |
|
Crust |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
24 |
71 |
10 |
29 |
34 |
|
Secondary infection |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
_ |
14 |
100 |
14 |
|
Total |
97 |
42 |
43 |
19 |
35 |
15 |
57 |
25 |
232 |
As can
be observed in the chart 4, in the study group 100%
of the prodromal stages, 95% of the vesicular ones
and 91% of crust stages were able to cure during the
first 48 hours. The patients with lesions infected
secondarily needed more than 48 hours to cure,
although they never surpassed 5 days.
These
results, although astonishing, are corroborated by
authors like Tunér and Schindl where they highlight
that a treatment with laser in the initial stages of
the Labial Herpes has a percentage of superior
success compared to conventional treatments, besides
achieving an almost immediate relief of the symptoms
(3, 11).
In the
control group remarkable differences are appreciated
when comparing them with that of the study group.
The therapy with Aciclovir in early stages (the
first 72 hours) has been broadly suitable for many
professionals and their use against the Labial
Herpes has been studied by some authors (5).
CONCLUSIONS
- The
periods of annual recurrence in the study group were
prolonged considerably after having received the
treatment, while in the control group so evident
changes were not shown.
- In
the prodromal period the patients treated with Laser
all cured in the first 48 hours, while those treated
conventionally needed from 3 to 4 days to cure. - In
the vesicular period and of crust, those of the
study group cured in majority during the first 48
hours, while those of the control group needed more
than 5 days.
- In
infected lesions those treated with Laser cured
mainly from 3 to 4 days, while those treated with
medications needed more than 7 days to cure.
References:
1.
Santana JC. Atlas of pathology of the buccal
complex. Havana: Editorial scientific-technique,
1985:30-34.
2.
Eversole LR. Buccal pathology. Diagnosis and
Treatment. Havana: Editorial scientific-technique,
1985:82-87. 3. Tunér J, Hode L. Low level laser
therapy - clinical practice and scientific
background. 1999. ISBN 91-630-7616-0.
4.
Parker J et al. The effects of laser therapy on
tissue repair and pain control: a meta-analysis of
the literature. Proc. Third Congress World Assn for
Laser Therapy, Athens, Greece, May 10-13 2000; p.
77.
5.
Vélez-González M et al.
Treatment of relapse in herpes simplex on labial and
facial areas and of primary herpes simplex on
genital areas and area pudenda with low power
HeNe-laser or Acyclovir administrated orally. SPIE
PROC. 1995; Vol. 2630: 43-50
6.
Garrigó MI, Valiant C. Biological Effects of the
radiation Laser of low power in the repair hística.
Rev. Cub Estomat, 1996; 33(2). 7. In: Simunovic Z,
editor: Lasers in Medicine and Dentistry. Vitagraf,
Croatia, 2000.
8.
Valiant C, Garrigó MI. Laser therapy in the
treatment of dental affections. Ed. Academy, Havana,
1995: 30-32.
9.
Valiant C. Cuban Experience in the application of
the Laser of low power. I study international:
Application of the Laser of low power in dentistry.
CIMEQ, City of Havana, April 2001.
10.
Garrigó MI. Clinical procedures with Laser in
bucodental illnesses. I study international:
Application of the Laser of low power in dentistry.
CIMEQ, City of Havana, 2001.
11.Schindl A, Neuman R. Low-intensity laser therapy
is an effective treatment forrecurrent herpes
simplex infection. Results from a randomized
double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Invest
Dermatol. 1999: 113 (2): 221-223.
|