M. Prochazka, M.D., Private Rehab Clinic "Jarov", Prague, CZ
Ass. prof. A. Hahn, ENT Clinic, FNKV Faculty Hospital, Prague, CZ
Abstract
Definition of tinnitus
records that it is an auditory perception for which there is no objective sonic
source from the outer environment. Our
original study, published in Laser Partner Clinixperience No. 4/2000, has
been regarded as a classical tinnitus work. It unambiguously confirmed clinical
experience of our predecessors, presented with a high amount of personal
enthusiasm (Shiomi, Wilden) but, unfortunately, not much based on statistics.
However, recently our study has gained corroboration by originally slightly
sceptical medical authorities obtaining statistically almost identical results.
Our study has been published more than two years ago. With the time passing by
we have been under the impression that the results might be even better than
those obtained during several-months therapy in the original cohort of patients.
This impression led to a decission that a new comparison with a larger group of
patients, than the original forty in our basic study, and followed in a longer
time horizon, might be of a certain interest. We were wondering whether our
clinical observations, confirmed by personal experience of other clinics, would
also find an adequate correlate in statistical expression.
Introduction
For our New Study the patients registered in our clinic due to tinnitus for
more than three years were chosen. With regard to maximum objectiveness, the
patients who had finished attendance due to unknown reasons were included in the
"no-effect" group, although we are well aware that a part of them
finished the treatment because of various other reasons (such as time cunsuming
engagements, problematic transport, family reasons). In a small group of 5
patients we tried to check the objective reasons by a phone query, and indeed, 2
patients gave other reasons whilst 3 patients had finished attendance due to
unsatisfactory or no result of procedures. Even though it is interesting for us to have another little group of 6
patients visiting our clinic for check ups and for a series of therapies despite
(after a year and more) zero effect of procedures. In a part of this group (in 3
patients) a certain subjective improvement (up to less than 50 per cent relief)
can be noticed after a long attendance (2 - 3 years). There is certainly a point
at issue, to what an extent this subjective improvement can be regarded as an
objective one, whether these patients have not settled down to their
complaint... It is a problem of little numbers, definitely not having any
influence over the total figure, however, from a clinical point of view we
consider this observation interesting... It should be also mentioned that,
in general, compliance of patients suffering from tinnitus is excellent, which
may be caused by the level of their subjective tribulations leading to a craving
to get rid of it.
Materials and Methods
We have evaluated in total 200 patients visiting our clinic since 1997 till
now for tinnitus, followed till 2001, i.e. at least for 3 years. With our
approval 8 patients, who were totally free of tinnitus after a short period of
treatment, were crossed off and finished attendance earlier. In this respect we
have an odd case history of a female patient, who was relieved of her several
years lasting lateralized tinnitus after a single mobilization of distal C
vertebra (note that entire 8.8 per cent of patients in our original study were
relieved of tinnitus only by mere physiotherapy procedures aimed at axial
skeleton - there really exists an often disputed diagnosis of vertebrally
conditioned tinnitus).
As it can be seen above, patients, who finished the therapy due to reasons
unknown, have been incorporated in the group "therapy with no effect".
Evaluated group of patients was chosen at random from the whole number of our
patients with tinnitus, the main condition being particularly regular attendance during
the period of the last three and more years. In all the patients a subjective
tinnitus had been diagnosed, i.e. an organic cause of this condition could not
be straightly determined by examinations (meaning that especially patients with
dg. neurinomus statoacusticus or another organic cause, such as a tumor or a
head injury with a positive finding by NMR, CT or EEG, were excluded). In this
respect we are well aware that some dubitation could be seen in possible
atherosclerotic changes of veins, especially of carotid veins and a. vertebrales, which might also be regarded as an organic cause of
tinnitus. However, with almost a hundred-per-cent level of incidence in population of
higher age categories it is rather difficult to call these changes a pathology.
Table 1 - Age groups of
followed patients
|
Age
|
0 - 15
|
15 - 25
|
25 - 35
|
35 - 45
|
45 - 55
|
55 - 65
|
65 - 75
|
75 +
|
Total |
|
Male
|
2
|
3
|
9
|
11
|
23
|
28
|
32
|
4
|
112 |
|
Female
|
0
|
4
|
7
|
16
|
19
|
25
|
16
|
1
|
88 |
|
Total
|
2
|
7
|
16
|
27
|
42
|
53
|
48
|
5
|
200 |
Our group (New Group) of patients consisted of 112 males and 88 females (in
comparison with our previous study there was an interesting shift towards higher
share of males, according to our opinion this more corresponds with the level of
distribution of tinnitus within population in relation to work anamnesis and
hobbies).
Average age was 64 years, ranging within the limits of 15 and 98 years. This
meant a shift towards higer categories of age, probably corresponding with the
incidence of tinnitus within the population, and maybe also due to the fact that
our activities have been covered by media, mainly by those focussed on seniors,
and thus new patients could have appeared on the basis of media influence.
Level of subjective complaints was evaluated according to, nowadays almost
classical, three scales:
-
Percentage scale (complaints
evaluated 100 per cent at the beginning of therapy, according to the level
of relief decreased to 80, 70 per cen, possible acceleration of problems
goes up to 110, 120 per cent, no tinnitus equals 0 per cent),
-
Five-grade scale - analogous
to pain scales (I = no tinnitus, V = tinnitus limiting all activities, II,
III and IV = clearly defined complaints)
-
Graphic scale (patient
marking 0 to 10, accompanied by a simple graphics showing face grimaces
according to his/her amount of subjective hardship).
This combination has proven more than suitable for evaluating such a
subjective suffering as tinnitus. Particularly nowadays, when most clinical
studies are aimed at evaluation of "quality of life" of individual
patients, this combination appears a good criterion to measure such a most
valuable state. Above mentioned combination can also make a serious processing
possible, with regard to different social, economic, expressive, cultural and
intelectual qualities of individual patients.
In order to simplify the effect of therapy as much as possible the results
were divided in four groups:
-
Patients with no effect of
comprehensive therapy (or even with aggravated condition, however we can say
that no patient has reported a setback of tinnitus after the therapy)
-
Less than 50 per cent relief
as far as subjective evaluation of the patient is concerned
-
More than 50 per cent relief
as far as subjective evaluation of the patient is concerned
-
No more tinnitus, patient
free of the disease.
This evaluation is identical with our previous study, and it enabled us to
compare easily the results of both studies.
Therapy
1. Medication:
Although we consecrate primarily to evaluation of a comprehensive rehab
therapy, obviously our patients are simultaneously medicated, too. We never
leave medication out, for in our complement of rehabilitative care there is no
need to be affraid of possible interactions between medicamentous and non-
medicamentous therapies. Furthermore, with the most frequently prescribed
medicaments - preparations based on Gingko bilobae extracts - also a possible
potenciation of effects of LLLT by these preparations is often discussed. Our
patients have mainly been medicated with Gingko preparations, the all-round
effects of which on stimulation of CNS as well as their positive influence on
blood reologic characteristics can be considered unambiguously proven. Clinical
practitioners will definitely appreciate minimum side effects (within our group
only one case of insomnia and one case of dermatitis).
Gingko bilobae preparations (Egb 761 extract) were taken by 146 patients,
i.e. 73 per cent. Another medicament - Betahistidine - was taken by 78 patients,
i.e. 39 per cent. We do not even oppose combination of both the preparations -
32 patients (16 per cent). 27 patients took other vasoactive medication (Cinarizine,
Enelbine, Geratam). 11 patients had no medication targeted on tinnitus, mainly due to another basic
diagnosis, the medication of which could
be considered contraindicated for above mentioned preparations.
Table 2- Medication of patients with tinnitus
|
MEDICATION
|
Egb 761
|
Betahistidine
|
Combined Egb 761 + Betahistidine
|
Other medication
|
No medication
|
|
Number of patients
|
146
|
78
|
32
|
27
|
11
|
|
Per cent of patients
|
73
|
39
|
16
|
13.5
|
5.5
|
2. Manipulation:
Another part of the therapy, though simultaneous, was a goal-directed
rehabilitative manipulation of axial skeleton, particularly of distal etages of
neck vertebra. Our classical paper has proven a frequent and statistically
important concurrence of incidence of tinnitus with a functional or organic
pathology of distal segments of C vertebra, especially C5/C6 parts.
Classical physiotherapy procedures, such as electrotherapy or other antalgic
physical procedures, as well as instructions for therapeutic physical exercise
in terms of directed relaxation of distal neck and trapezius etc., are focussed
on this part of aetiology of tinnitus. We have also found useful traction
therapy, in terms of tractions with the possibility of modulated mode to
intermitent intensity of traction momentum in the horizontal (Eltrac by Nonius).
Device techniques are chosen strictly individually, same applies to forms of
physical exercise, based on diagnostic-therapeutic consideration of a rehab
specialist. Physical exercise was prescribed to 100 per cent of patients, device
techniques were applied on 186 patients (contraindications in 14 patients). We
have noticed in two cases of DD currents (antalgic myorelaxation physiotherapy)
an unwanted side effect - a dermatitis in the areas of contact of electrodes,
probably due to a touch of nickel in the electrodes.
It is important to mention a positive psychological effect of procedures
aimed at the axial skeleton from the point of view of the patient`s evaluation
of our therapeutical activities. Even patients with no final effect of therapy
on tinnitus percieve positively the effect on affection of pain of axial
skeleton, and this always appears to a certain extent, with regard to the
category of age of our patients...
|

|

|
|
Picture 1 –
Manipulation of neck vertebra
|
Picture 2 –
Manipulation of neck vertebra
|
3.
LLLT - Physiotherapy aimed at the initial organ of hearing:
There is no need to discuss necessary parameters of laser probes used. We
need an infrared laser beam with a sufficient power output (we have been using
an IR 300 mW laser probe, we also tried using a 450 mW probe but a part of our
patients reported a subjectively unpleasant thermic effect in the area of
application). On the other hand, we pay maximum attention to irradiation of a
sufficient dosage of energy.
In our clinic we use the following techniques of LLLT application:
-
application on meatus
acusticus externus - in the direction of the axis of the auditory duct -
continuous beam 50 J/cm2 followed by 25 J/cm2,
frequency modulation of 5 Hz,
-
irradiation of processus
mastoideus - directed on the center, the vector of the beam in the direction
of counter-lateral orbit, continuous beam 90 J/cm2 ,
followed by 45 J/cm2 with 5 Hz pulse frequency.
Modulation of 5 Hz we use due to assumed potenciation of stimulative effect
of non-invasive laser.
We strictly appeal to maintain the direction of the vector of aiming the beam
- in fact the target structure of the helix is a shape of several square
milimeters. It might be the reason why, when compared with other laser devices
with the same output parameters, therapy with Maestro/CCM probes has proved
rather successful due to their characteristic diffusion of the emitted beam,
increasing probability of hitting desired target structures (difference of
prognostic level of success between hitting the target with a shotgun or with a
rifle - thanks to ass. prof. Horak for his witty comparison). LLLT has been
applied on 100 per cent of our patients.
Attendance was scheduled so that the first series of 8 - 10 procedures in
total, twice a week, be a complex consisting of medication, rehabilitation
therapy of axial skeleton, and LLLT. In the interval of 2 - 3 months further
courses of therapy follow, usually consisting of 5 - 6 therapies, once a week,
always as a series of LLLT procedures. Therapy of axial skeleton is added when
necessary (often not necessary in case of regularly exercising patients,
instructed properly in the course of the first series). Medication with Egb 761
continuing in the long term, most of the patients after several months of
therapy with a reduced dosage 1 - 0 - 1 tablets, in the order of at least
several more months. A part of the patients in the cycle between procedures has
noticed a possibility to titrate medication according to immediate subjective
complaints - it means they keep to regular dosage 1 - 0 - 0, when tinnitus
accelerates switching to 1 - 1 - 0, or even to 1 - 1 - 1 tablets. Possible
episodes of accelerated tinnitus usually abate quickly then. In case of long
term stabilized patients we plan clinical check ups at least twice a year,
always connected with mobilisation of acute blockades of distal C vertebra.
Inviting patients for these check ups always in the spring and fall has proved
successful.
We have noticed one rather substantial phenomenon of LLLT: so far no side
effect has been reported. On the other hand, there is an interesting clinical
finding in a certain group of patients (6 patients = 3 per cent), an
acceleration of tinnitus after the first few LLLT procedures. Positive aspect
of this phenomenon is that these patients have always belonged in the group with
a massive effect of the therapy (more than 50 per cent relief, or even free of
tinnitus at all). This clinical observation has been personally confirmed by
other authors working at tinnitus treatment with the use of LLLT (Wilden).
|

|

|
|
Picture 3 –
Irradiation of Meatus Acusticus Externus
|
Picture 4 –
Irradiation of Meatus Acusticus Externus -detail
|
|

|

|
|
Picture 5 –
Irradiation of Procesus Mastoideus
|
Picture 6 –
Irradiation of Procesus Mastoideus
|
Placebo LLLT
Due to persistently appearing theories on the effect of LLLT of tinnitus
being a mere placebo we have created a minor group of 31 patients in order to
confirm or exclude this hypothesis. In the course of three months attendance these
patients underwent medication therapy as well as physiotherapy of axial skeleton
with classical rehabilitation techniques in the same extent as all the other
patients did. Instead of a functional laser source these patients were treated
with a probe not emitting laser beam, although there was acoustic as well as
visual signalization of operation. Among all other physiotherapeutic devices a
non-invasive laser is extremely suitable to perform a placebo test, since its
application on a patient is not connected with any subjective feelings nor
phenomenons (in contradiction to electrotherapy, for instance). As we work with
an IR wavelength, it was possible to arrange a double blind study, for the fact
whether the therapist works with a device emitting laser beam or with a placebo
unit was not even known to the therapeutic personnel.
The results - unambiguously confirming that there is no placebo involved in
LLLT - are summarized in Table 2.
The outcome is undoubtedly statistically significant.
Table 3 - Comparison of clinical effect of - 6 months vs. 3 years
vs. placebo
|
EFFECT OF THERAPY
|
Original Group
(31 patients - 6 months)
|
New Group
(200 patients - 3 years)
|
Placebo Group
(31 patients - 3 months)
|
|
No effect
|
19.4 %
|
16.0 %
|
25.8 %
|
|
Less than 50 per cent reliéf
|
19.4 %
|
15.0 %
|
48.4 %
|
|
More than 50 per cent reliéf
|
35.5 %
|
43.0 %
|
25.8 %
|
|
No more tinnitus
|
25.8 %
|
26.0 %
|
0.0 %
|
Statistical comparison
Courtesy: Mr. Arnost Komarek, Biostatistisch Centrum,
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Statistical comparison of the two groups, differing from each other by the
length of therapy was done with the use of χ 2
test of homogenity of
two multinomic separations, confirming whether distribution of monitored
population into groups according to the effect of therapy is equal for both
groups, i.e. after 6 months and 3 years of therapy.
Expressed in mathematical terms, let us suppose that the
effect of therapy in both studied populations (6 months vs. 3 years) is directed
by multinomic division, i.e. that a given person belongs with a certain
probability (based on population) to one of the four groups according to the
effect of therapy. It will be statistically tested whether the probability of
participation in individual groups is equal in both populations. We can
pronounce an alternative hypothesis, that the probability to belong at least to
one group according to the therapy is different in populations studied.
For the calculation of testing statistics it is necessary
to calculate expected frequencies, i.e. frequencies which could be monitored
under a hypothesis that the length of therapy has no influence on the effect.
Higher differences between relative and expected frequency testify against the
hypothesis of zero influence of the length of therapy.
Table 4 - Monitored relative occurrence
|
EFFECT OF THERAPY
|
Original group
6 months / 31 patients
|
New group
3 years / 200 patients
|
|
No effect
|
19.4 %
|
16.0 %
|
|
Less than 50 per cent reliéf
|
19.4 %
|
15.0 %
|
|
More than 50 per cent reliéf
|
35.5 %
|
43.0 %
|
|
No more tinnitus
|
25.8 %
|
26.0 %
|
Table 5 - Expected absolute occurrence
|
EFFECT OF THERAPY
|
Original group
6 months / 31 patients
|
New group
3 years / 200 patients
|
|
No effect
|
5.11
|
32.91
|
|
Less than 50 per cent reliéf
|
4.84
|
31.18
|
|
More than 50 per cent reliéf
|
13.03
|
83.98
|
|
No more tinnitus
|
8.06
|
51.94
|
Table 6 - Monitored absolute occurrence
|
EFFECT OF THERAPY
|
Original group
6 months / 31 patients
|
New group
3 years / 200 patients
|
|
No effect
|
6
|
32
|
|
Less than 50 per cent reliéf
|
6
|
30
|
|
More than 50 per cent reliéf
|
11
|
86
|
|
No more tinnitus
|
8
|
52
|
The χ 2 test statistics, which is in the case of
zero hypothesis directed by χ 2 division with 3 grades of loose in the
first group is :
χ 2 =
0.88.
Monitored p value equals 0.83, which is
rather a high level and thus it can be stated that the difference between the
two groups with different duration of therapy is not statistically significant.
Discussion
-
Patients with no effect of
Comprehensive Laser Therapy: the figure will definitely be higher by the
number of patients who finished the therapy due to reasons other than zero
effect of treatment. We ourselves had been expecting a higher decrease of
representation of this group and therefore we were rather surprised by the
result. However, it is quite logical that in the course of three years there
are more patients who finish the attendance of therapeutic procedures due to
other reasons than due to zero effect of procedures. In the particular group
of patients it was only 11 patients finishing attendance of procedures sua
sponte, i.e. total 5.5 per cent of patients, however these are listed in New
Group. This number correlate rather well even with correction of 2 patients
(of total 5 patients) contacted by phone. Should we try to take these
patients into account, the results in the table would look even better.
Despite of this, we have left the numbers as it is, in the name of
objectiveness.
-
Almost identical number of
patients with less than 50 per cent relief in the Original and New Groups.
Decrease in this cohort of patients has been caused by shifting the patients
to "no-effect" group (however erased from the evidence due to
other reasons), but particularly by moving them to "more than 50 per
cent relief", or even to "no more tinnitus" group.
-
The most significant, and
most pleasant fact of the New Group is the shift in terms of positive effect
on tinnitus, evaluated by the patients as more than 50 per cent relief or
even as no more tinnitus.
Conclusion
After three years of clinical monitoring 200 patients after Comprehensive
Laser Therapy (medication, rehab physiotherapy aimed at axial skeleton and LLLT)
of tinnitus have been evaluated with the following results:
-
16
per cent of patients with no effect (however, approximately one third of
this group may have finished attendance due to other reasons than in direct
relation to the results of therapy, attendance finished sua sponte by the
patient),
-
15
per cent of patients marking their relief of tinnitus as less than 50 per
cent alleviation (evaluation through combination of three different scales),
having in mind especially the criterion of "quality of life",
-
43
per cent of patients, the biggest group consisting of patients evaluating
their relief of tinnitus within mentioned scales as more than 50 per cent,
-
26
per cent of patients are totally free of tinnitus.
We had expected a shift in the statistics towards better values in terms of
subjective patients evaluation of improvement after a longer time of systhematic
therapy. However, from the point of view of statistical significance, expressed
in exact tests, there was no statistically significant shift. Despite of this,
our study confirms a correctly created complement of therapeutic care of
tinnitus patients, especially thanks to high level of success of this therapy in
terms of the level of relief of patients, thus improving their "quality of
life". This goal should always be our priority.
Model protocol
|
PRE-EXAMINATION EVALUATION
|
Co-peration between specialists
|
|
|
EXAMINATION PART
|
Gathering anamnesic data
|
Acoustic trauma in the anamnesis (regardless to one-time episode or a chronic
burden)
|
|
Abuse of potentially ototoxic medicaments
(especially antibiotics, total anesthesia)
|
|
Ocurrence of tinnitus in family anamnesis
|
|
Evaluation of the level of subjective
suffering
|
Percentage scale
|
|
Five-grade scale
|
|
Ten-grade scale with graphics showing
mimics
|
|
Clinical examination
|
Thorough otoneurological examination
|
|
Thorough examination of axial skeleton
|
|
Nystagmus
|
|
Blood pressure
|
|
Technical means of examination
|
Audiogram + masking of tinnitus
|
|
CT/NMR
|
|
X-ray of C vertebra
|
|
ENG
|
|
Tinnitogram
|
|
Lab tests
|
Especially detection of diabetes mellitus
|
|
Lipide metabolism disorders
|
|
Functional pathology of axial skeleton
|
Patients should always be examined by a
specialist on myoskeletal medicin
|
|
THERAPY
|
Medication
|
Preferably indicated by an ENT specialist:
vasoactive medication, antihistaminics, nootropics
|
|
Good experience with Gingko biloba
preparations: Egb 761, Tanakan, Tebokan pills
|
|
Frequent changing of the scheme
of medication not suitable
|
|
Rehab therapy
|
Aimed at the axial skeleton
|
|
Physiotherapy focussed on analgesia and
relaxation of muscle spasms (DD currents by Bernard, interferential
currents, pulsed magnetic field (these techniques applied on distal parts
of neck vertebra).
|
|
Traction therapy – horizontal tractions,
preferrably devices with pulsed modulation
|
|
Mobilization (manipulation) of
current functional blockades.
|
|
Therapeutic physical exercise, techniques
aimed at distal parts of neck vertebra, postizometric relaxation
activities, automobilization activities
|
|
LLLT
|
Basic requirements on the device: IR
(830nm), power output 250 mW - 400 mW
|
|
Possibility of a head rest, adjustable
stand holding the probe in required position, therapy lasts about 15
minutes on one ear
|
|
Non-contact in a milimeter distance
|
|
Irradiation points:
|
-
Mastoideus: 90 J/sq cm – cw, followed by 45 J/sq cm – pulsed 5
Hz.
-
Duct: 50 J continuous + 25 J, 5 Hz.
|
-
2 – 3 times a week
-
8 - 10 applications in total
-
4 – 6 weeks break
-
following series may be to cut to 5 – 6 therapies, once a week
-
minimum 5 series in total
|